BC, Utah State, ASU, whatever else: #SearchSZN

CurryHicksSage avatar
Curry Hicks Sage
@CurryHicksSageMar 24, 2026

The Spaces focused on the Boston College men’s basketball coaching search, with host Curry emphasizing that BC’s reported refusal to fund roster-building beyond a 15% slice of its ~$21M revenue share is the central sticking point. Curry argues that a first-time head coach like UConn assistant Luke Murray would only accept if guaranteed additional roster budget (true NIL/donor support) and leverage, given ACC spending by peers (UNC, Duke, Louisville, Virginia, Syracuse). John Becker (Vermont) and Eric Konkol (Tulsa) were framed as competent, lower-upside fits if BC holds the line; speculation persists that BC may have adjusted its stance late. Timing for a Murray decision would likely track with UConn’s tournament run and the portal calendar. Beyond BC, Curry assessed Utah State’s reopening (remote, NIL up from ~$880K to ~$2.5M; good but capped), contrasted fit for first-time HCs versus low-expectation P5s, and highlighted how roster budgets often outweigh X-and-O acumen. He noted Randy Bennett to Arizona State (with Mickey McConnell taking over at Saint Mary’s) and predicted USF trends toward Antoine Pettway (Kennesaw) given ties and the Nate Oats coaching tree, with Ryan Pannone and Charlie Henry as system-adjacent names. A listener from Uganda briefly shared a grassroots children’s initiative at the end.

Twitter Space Summary: Coaching Searches, NIL Dynamics, and Institutional Constraints

Overview

A wide-ranging conversation centered on ongoing college basketball coaching searches, with Boston College’s opening as the focal case. The host (Curry) and guests discussed NIL/roster budget realities, Rev share constraints, donor infrastructure, candidate leverage, and timing with the transfer portal. Additional threads covered Utah State’s opening, first-time head coach challenges, a purported Randy Bennett move to Arizona State (presented as fact by the host), and the USF search. The session ended with an off-topic plea from a listener in Uganda.

Key Participants

  • Curry (host; referred to as “Curry” by guests; appears to be a UMass-rooted media personality/commentator)
  • BC Film Room (guest; Boston College-focused account; Michigan fan)
  • Adam (guest; asked about USF search)
  • Marvin (listener from Uganda; off-topic intervention)

Opening Notes and Context

  • The host referenced completing an “Abuse Awareness 2026” coaching course and the bleak tone of a recent UMass press conference with Frank Martin. He expressed frustration and disengagement from UMass until wholesale changes occur.
  • Administrative aside: donations via Venmo reportedly outperformed new site subscriptions on this occasion.

Boston College Head Coach Search

  • State of play: BC has interviewed a large slate (approximately 12–15) of candidates. Many withdrew or signaled “no dice” early due to a stated constraint: only 15% of a reported $21M Rev share (≈$3.15M) can be applied to men’s basketball roster budget, with no additional NIL funds permitted outside Rev share.
  • Institutional dynamics:
    • President William P. Leahy (“Father Leahy”) is said to have ruled the institution strongly for ~30 years and is leaving this summer.
    • AD Blake James is characterized as controlling the process and initially holding the line on the Rev share-only constraint.
    • Donor/NIL infrastructure is a sticking point: without permission to raise “outside-of-Rev-share” dollars (true NIL or equivalently structured roster funds), candidates view the job as non-competitive in ACC terms.
  • Leading names and statuses (as discussed):
    • Luke Murray (UConn assistant): framed as the premium candidate with leverage due to back-to-back national titles and high-end roster-building exposure. Host repeatedly emphasized that Murray would be unlikely to accept BC without assurance of additional roster money beyond Rev share and/or permission to raise it independently.
    • John Becker (Vermont head coach): positioned by the host as a competent, lower-leverage candidate who could deliver passable basketball (e.g., occasional 16–17-win seasons) under limited budget. Noted as having won a lot but not a “miracle worker.” The host relayed secondhand impressions that Becker interviews poorly but is a capable coach.
    • Eric Konkol (Tulsa head coach): cited as fitting the “BC archetype”—competent, non-ruffling, near-30-win season this year, ties to Jim Larrañaga (and thus to Blake James via Miami). Host said he’d be surprised if Konkol ultimately gets it but also acknowledged how neatly he fits BC’s historical profile under constraints.
    • Jay Larranaga (NBA assistant): viewed as lower leverage in this context compared with Murray.
    • James Jones (Yale head coach): reportedly not considered seriously because BC wanted someone with direct NIL navigation experience; host found it ironic given BC’s own constraints.
    • Eric Olen (UC San Diego head coach): described as having real traction at one point; interest reportedly broke down over BC’s unwillingness to go beyond Rev share.
  • ACC competitiveness lens:
    • Host argued that ~$3.15M roster budget is functionally mid-major in the ACC, and that even elite tacticians will be severely limited against spenders (he named North Carolina, Duke, Louisville, Virginia, Syracuse, Virginia Tech). He allowed that exceptional coaching can keep a team “in games,” but sustained success at ACC level is improbable without more resources.
  • Timeline considerations with Murray (if chosen):
    • If UConn continues deep into March/April, announcement and start could be delayed. Assistants sometimes do partial onboarding while still with their current teams, but BC’s budget constraints would make “first pick” in the portal unlikely.
    • Host speculated a savvy candidate could leverage BC’s delay and candidate attrition to negotiate permission to raise extra funds or secure a larger roster budget.
  • Meta dynamic: The host floated the notion that grim NIL chatter around BC is so widely internalized that BC might be playing “3D chess,” delaying to ultimately pivot; BC Film Room was skeptical, calling that too simple for Blake James’s history.

NIL, Rev Share, and Donor Infrastructure (Framework explained)

  • Rev share: BC’s reported maximum is $21M, with 15% allocated to men’s basketball (≈$3.15M). This is shared across sports; football and hockey are significant internal priorities.
  • True competitiveness requires money beyond Rev share, via NIL collectives/donors and a local infrastructure for legitimate deals.
  • Without presidential/AD support to marshal donors toward NIL/roster funds, candidates are hamstrung. Host emphasized any first-time head coach should insist on more resources or permission to raise them, else career upside is limited.

First-Time Head Coach Challenges

  • Host asserted the first 12–13 months are “awful” across most jobs—administrative load, staff management, and non-basketball issues compound. Under low expectations (BC), a Year 1 wash is tolerable; at a program accustomed to winning (e.g., Utah State), a 19–11 Year 1 might be deemed failure.
  • Examples: Jerome Tang and Tommy Lloyd succeeded early due to long apprenticeships under elite head coaches; others need time to develop identity and systems.

Utah State Opening

  • Perception vs reality: Utah State is seen as a strong stepping-stone because recent coaches win quickly and leave (Sprinkle, Odom, Calhoun), but it’s remote and resource-limited compared to some peers.
  • Budget trajectory: reportedly up from ~$880k to ~$2.5M this past year, maybe ~$3M soon—still modest relative to top mid-majors (host cited VCU as spending roughly double).
  • Candidate calculus: The host mentioned chatter about Flynn Clayman (High Point) and questioned whether moving into a stronger league with tougher, better-funded competition is wiser than staying at a place one already dominates via spending.
  • Comparative job value: For a first-time head coach, BC’s low expectations could be safer than Utah State’s success norms.

Claim: Randy Bennett to Arizona State; Mickey McConnell to Saint Mary’s

  • Host stated Randy Bennett is taking over at Arizona State and that long-time assistant Mickey McConnell ascended at Saint Mary’s, eliminating a search there.
  • He framed it positively for the sport: Bennett matching wits in the Big 12 against Kelvin Sampson, Bill Self, Scott Drew, etc., if Arizona State resources follow.
  • Note: This was presented by the host as fait accompli during the session.

USF Head Coach Search

  • Host’s expectation: Antoine Pettway (Kennesaw State) as frontrunner, citing compelling ties to the Amir Abdur-Rahim pipeline (Amir came to USF from Kennesaw State) and the Alabama coaching network (akin to Bryan Hodgson and others).
  • Other names discussed:
    • Takayo Siddle (UNCW): rumored previously.
    • Tony Skinn (George Mason): rumored to have turned USF down in an earlier cycle.
    • Charlie Henry (Georgia Southern): praised as doing a strong job in a tough Sun Belt situation.
    • Ryan Pannone (Alabama tree; described as a USF alum and offense innovator with ties to Nate Oats’s scheme): the host floated an “Alabama tree continuity” possibility.

Additional Observations and Examples

  • Assistants leaving while teams still active: Host cited Justin Joiner (Oregon State) as still working with Michigan; also referenced David Cox’s prior move to Rhode Island as more of a succession plan case.
  • Air Force hire: Praised Joe Crispin’s selection (Rowan -> Penn State assistant -> Air Force), arguing bad jobs can justify creative, out-of-the-box choices with little downside.

Audience Interactions

  • BC Film Room’s central worry: the delta between Luke Murray and “the next guy” is massive; if Murray accepts, does it necessarily mean BC granted the latitude to raise/expand roster funds?
  • Adam asked about USF; host favoured Pettway while canvassing the Alabama-tree ecosystem.
  • Off-topic: Marvin from Uganda described starting a foundation/orphanage for children in rural areas and invited followers/support.

Notable Host Claims/Positions (as presented)

  • He asserted his earlier pinned-tweet predictions for this cycle were all accurate except BC (still open), and cited wins like Cincinnati, Syracuse, Providence; he referenced taking a risk on “Randy Bennett to Arizona” earlier in the tournament and later stated Bennett to Arizona State as having happened.
  • He emphasized that in the ACC, roster budgets around ~$3M are non-competitive against the top spenders, regardless of coaching acumen.
  • He repeatedly argued any first-time head coach (especially Murray) must negotiate for more funds or permission to raise them, or risk career stagnation.

Practical Takeaways

  • For BC:
    • The hire is likely tethered to resolving the Rev share-only constraint. If Luke Murray is the choice, it strongly implies new flexibility or added dollars to the roster budget.
    • If BC holds the line, expect a competent but lower-leverage hire (Konkol/Becker profile), and a ceiling of “respectable but limited” outcomes in ACC play.
  • For timing:
    • If hiring an assistant from a deep tournament run (e.g., UConn), expect delayed onboarding and potential early portal disadvantages unless budget changes unlock early traction.
  • For broader searches:
    • Utah State remains attractive but resource-bound; fit and expectation management matter, especially for first-time head coaches.
    • USF’s logic favours Pettway, with Alabama network continuity and a known pathway that worked with Abdur-Rahim.

Open Questions to Monitor

  • Will BC publicly signal changes to NIL/roster budget policy (permission to raise outside-of-Rev-share funds)?
  • If Luke Murray is their target, do they announce pre- or post-UConn’s exit, and what terms (budget, donor access) accompany the hire?
  • Does Utah State’s budget rise beyond ~$2.5–3M, and how does that impact candidate quality and tenure length?
  • USF’s final decision and whether it continues the Alabama coaching network lineage.