Town hall Tuesday 4th attempt lol

The Spaces convened Dave, Noble, Jill and others to dissect a faith‑anchored, affidavit‑driven strategy for reclaiming constitutional rights and civic accountability. Dave emphasized grounding every action in fundamental law—state constitutions, maxims, and courts of record—rather than case law or commercial constructs, describing how unrebutted affidavits trigger officials’ duties and can reshape outcomes. Noble shared his ongoing fight against qualified immunity, arguing it is a judicial assumption rather than constitutional law, and sought tactical guidance on timing and venue of notices. A vivid courtroom episode illustrated a judge’s deference when confronted with clear constitutional citations. The group rejected UCC and “in commerce” framing for government interactions, asserting private rights outside the commerce clause. Biblical references (Luke 11:52; “It is written”) framed lawyers’ knowledge gatekeeping and the need to restore first principles. They recounted activism (election audits, Epstein grand jury pressure) and predicted institutional shifts (e.g., ATF‑related Supreme Court moves). Beyond law, they advocated community resilience: farms, PMAs, silver‑hedged finance, skill monetization (e.g., hunting/HOA guides), and health via natural foods and herbs. Practical steps included pre‑filing affidavits, coordinated notices, keeping certain matters private, and joining Dave’s law bundle and PMA.

Taohao Tuesday Vol. 4 – Fundamental law, affidavits, and movement strategy

Participants and roles

• Dave (host; primary legal strategist and facilitator; “Speaker 1”): Leads the session, frames the legal/constitutional approach, ties strategy to biblical principles, recounts courtroom experiences, advocates affidavit-driven action, promotes the private “law bundle” and PMA membership.
• Noble (guest; “Speaker 4”): First time on Twitter Spaces; driving during the call; focused on challenging qualified immunity; recently in court with a judge; probing practicalities of affidavits, notices, and “settle with your adversary quickly.”
• Jill (co-host/moderator; “Speaker 3”): Manages tech check-ins, reads Luke 11:52 (KJV), tracks prior segments, underscores key takeaways.
• Unidentified speaker (“Speaker 2”): Brief interjections.
• Referenced but not present: Jaron/Jackson (frequent collaborator who echoes Dave’s teaching), Jim Jordan, Marjorie Taylor Greene, judges/prosecutors in recent cases.

Session overview

The group explores a law-first, scripture-aligned strategy for civic action centered on maxims, constitutions, and affidavits—not case law or commercial/UCC theories. They recount a recent courtroom interaction where clear constitutional grounding reportedly shifted a judge’s posture, discuss building collective pressure through notices and unrebutted affidavits, and emphasize long-term preparation, diligence, and mutual accountability. They weave activism topics (ATF/Supreme Court shifts, election audits, Epstein disclosures) with practical guidance on who to serve, when to file, and how to avoid self-limiting frames (e.g., “in commerce”). The session closes with community-building, economic self-reliance, and health/lifestyle recommendations.

Platform/tech notes

• Recurring audio dropouts (host could not hear others at times); Jill and Noble could hear each other when Dave could not.
• Dave flags potential censorship/suppression (earlier account removal tied to political disputes; difficulty finding his Spaces in-app), suggests joining Telegram and his private school platform to ensure continuity.

Core themes and positions

1) Momentum of the movement: maxims, spirit, and inevitability

• Noble’s framing: “collective spirit” and momentum as a force difficult to stop—invoking physics metaphors (light can only be reflected or absorbed).
• Dave agrees: unity around clear maxims is an unstoppable social force; the goal is to let the maxims “do the arm twisting.”

2) Courtroom episode: constitutional primacy and a judge’s reaction

• Noble recounts anger before a hearing; Dave walked him to Texas Constitution Article 27 (as described), focusing on due process and oath-bound obligations.
• Dave’s read on the judge: impressed and searching—“eyes into her soul”—reportedly asking the prosecutor for a rebuttal to Noble’s points and becoming careful about impartiality.
• Lesson: send tightly grounded affidavits/notices at least two weeks before hearing; written, pre-hearing record smooths in-court dynamics.
• Group diagnosis: when a judge turns to a prosecutor and asks for a rebuttal instead of bulldozing, it signals the judge perceives real risk in ignoring the presented law.

3) Affidavit-centric strategy: notices, proof, and avoiding self-limiting frames

• Unrebutted/uncontroverted affidavits: stand as truth if not countered; function as sworn notice that triggers duties of redress. Affidavits plus notices eliminate “we weren’t trained” or “we didn’t know” defenses.
• “Acceptance and performance”: Noble calls out how notice via affidavit prompts obligations; Dave: the obligation already exists; the notice removes plausible deniability.
• Avoid “in commerce” and UCC framing: Dave warns adding “in commerce” can limit scope and invite jurisdictional overreach via the Commerce Clause; most interactions with public officials are about private rights, not commerce (e.g., driving for family errands vs operating a taxi).
• Who to serve: Tailor recipients to those with duties implicated (prosecutors, agency heads, oversight bodies, etc.). Dave advises Noble not to file certain notices into a matter where Noble previously reached an agreement with a judge—handle through direct service and separate channels. Coordinate specifics offline.

4) Qualified immunity critique and collective affidavit movement

• Noble: 3–4 years studying qualified immunity; sees it as a judicial assumption rather than legislatively granted authority—argues it’s unconstitutional.
• Dave: The affidavit-based, constitutional-maxims approach offers a more powerful way to confront entrenched doctrines than relying on judicially expanded immunity; collective sworn notices can build record and pressure.

5) “It is written”: Scripture as model for legal posture

• Dave’s principle: lead with “It is written”—invoke constitutions, oaths, and maxims as trust documents; keep disputes anchored to the highest written authority.
• “Prove all things, hold fast that which is good”: the group culture insists on verifiability; members challenge each other in public to produce the text. Avoids folklore (e.g., “Clarefield Trust” myths) and emphasizes source documents.

6) Case law vs. fundamental law

• Dave minimizes reliance on case citations until participants internalize maxims and constitutions. Courts repeat what is already declared by the people; constitutions and laws “precede the judiciary.”
• Many misread cited cases; judges sometimes embed maxims unnoticed. Dave cites teaching sessions on Marbury v. Madison that surfaced principles often ignored in mainstream summaries.

7) “Woe unto you, lawyers” (Luke 11:52 KJV) and the hiding of knowledge

• Jill reads Luke 11:52; Dave interprets: lawyers took away keys of knowledge, created administrative detours, and avoided real courts; claims mid-20th-century shifts (1930s–1940s) suppressed fundamental principles and jury trials in favor of administrative schemes.
• Strategy response: recover older sources, original state constitutions, and foundational texts; expect resistance when invoking real law (attorneys “hinder” those entering with the key).

8) Political pressure and results (as claimed by participants)

• ATF/Supreme Court: Dave says he forecasted congressional and judicial reactions (e.g., Jim Jordan, SCOTUS seeking cases) after coordinated notice campaigns; group members are cited as witnesses to timing.
• Election “full forensic audits”: Dave claims he innovated a remedy from maxims (“for every wrong, there is a remedy”), arguing constitutions require counting “every legal vote,” which justifies ballot-level testing. Asserts this rationale secured access to all ballots.
• Epstein disclosures: participants believe sustained pressure (flyers, murals, public statements) moved officials; cite Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene saying pressure on this topic is unprecedented.
• Caveat: These are participants’ narratives; no external verification was presented within the session.

9) Preparation ethos: train before the fight

• Dave’s martial arts analogy: you only bring to the fight what you trained beforehand. The group invests in study “when nobody’s looking,” aiming to be 10 steps ahead.
• Group discipline: don’t speak what you can’t prove; purge misquotes; insist on written authority in live exchanges.

10) Municipal finance, incentives, and natural resources

• Revenue pathways: Cities leverage federal programs (e.g., highway safety) that incentivize ticketing, impoundment, forfeitures; raises conflict-of-interest concerns.
• Property and resources: Dave cites maxims that landholders own “from the depths to the sky”; expresses skepticism of separated “mineral rights.” Notes allodial title and bans on feudal tenure in constitutions.
• Utilities and water: Distinguishes private rights from entitlement. Water/electricity may be “free” in nature, but delivering them requires capital-intensive infrastructure and operations. Options include wells, delivered tanks, or communal springs.
  • Noble: Minnesota’s communal springs (e.g., Fred Miller Springs) provide free water; alleges city resistance to public access.
  • Dave: Supports local self-reliance (springs, wells). Encourages production mindset over entitlement: “if you don’t work, you don’t eat.”

11) Practical theology: “Settle with your adversary quickly?”

• Noble queries whether Jesus commanded quick settlement with adversaries.
• Dave’s view: Context matters. Jesus didn’t “settle” with false witnesses; he pursued purpose. Within church disputes, scripture recommends internal resolution (avoid heathen courts) or accept being defrauded; prefer righteous internal adjudication (twelve as a jury archetype). In civic disputes, lead with written law and oaths.

12) Economic self-reliance and community blueprint

• Build productive capacity: farms (uncontaminated food), animal husbandry, herbs, and real estate.
• Financial strategy: accumulate silver as a hedge; use private lending among members; convert notes to acquire land/assets; repay interest within community; grow silver holdings alongside real assets.
• Knowledge monetization: create ebooks/courses on practical skills—hunting, butchering, jerky-making, homesteading, HOA law. Example: “Summer Cook” authored ~20 children’s law books and earned ~$10k early; expected to scale.
• Focus on larger gains: don’t get stuck pursuing small debts when larger opportunities beckon.

13) Health and resilience

• Alerts: insect/tick risks; advise stocking herbal blends.
• Health insurance skepticism: Dave views it as poor value for most; emphasizes prevention via diet and herbs; doctors for emergencies.
• Diet guidance: favor whole foods and traditional fats (butter, tallow) over processed oils/sprays; emulate forebears’ diets and activity.

Tactical guidance and process notes

• Before court: Serve clear, tightly sourced affidavits/notices at least two weeks prior; anchor to constitutions, oaths, and maxims.
• In filings: Avoid language that invites jurisdictional traps (e.g., “in commerce”); keep matters framed in private rights and constitutional duties.
• Service targeting: Identify actual duty-bearers (prosecutors, agency heads, oversight, legislative committees) to ensure notice lands where obligations reside.
• Posture: Stay factual, avoid folklore, and be prepared to cite the exact text on the record.
• Coordination: For sensitive matters (e.g., an ongoing case with a prior judicial agreement), confer privately before filing or serving.

Action items and next steps

• Noble: DM Dave the specifics of the prosecutor and case posture; keep sensitive filings out of matters with prior judicial agreements unless advised.
• Community: Organize collective affidavit campaigns on priority issues (constitutional overreach, due process lapses, agency extensions of commerce authority).
• Education: Join the private “law bundle” and family PMA for structured study and mutual support; use Telegram/alternative channels in case Spaces discoverability remains impaired.
• Outreach: Continue lawful public pressure (flyers, public statements, records requests) to reinforce sworn notices and create visible civic demand.
• Health: Adopt preventive nutrition and herbal strategies; prepare for seasonal/tick-related risks.

Notable quotes and maxims reiterated

• “It is written.” Lead with constitutions, oaths, and maxims.
• “Prove all things; hold fast that which is good.” Verify every claim.
• “For every wrong, there’s a remedy.” Lack of statutory remedy invites designing one consistent with maxims.
• “Unrebutted affidavits stand as truth.” Silence in the face of sworn fact creates a record that compels action.
• Avoid self-limiting frames (“in commerce”), which can cede jurisdiction.

Highlights and takeaways

• The group’s method is deliberately pre-litigation and record-focused: serve precise affidavits/notices anchored in constitutions and maxims; extract acknowledgments of duty; avoid traps.
• The courtroom anecdote illustrates how a judge’s posture can change when confronted with clear constitutional commitments and the oath framework.
• A shared ethos of discipline—speaking only what can be proven from the highest sources—builds credibility and reduces risk.
• Activism narratives (audits, ATF/SCOTUS, Epstein pressure) underscore the belief that coordinated affidavits and public pressure can catalyze institutional shifts.
• Long-term resilience involves parallel tracks: legal mastery, economic productivity, community lending, content creation, and health self-reliance.

Open questions (for future sessions)

• Specifics of Texas Constitution Article 27 application and procedural best practices for similar cases.
• Optimal service matrices for notices (who, when, sequence) in qualified immunity challenges.
• Metrics for evaluating effectiveness of affidavit campaigns (responses, policy shifts, case outcomes).
• Validation/replication strategies for claimed institutional reactions (congressional moves, court docket shifts, investigations).

Closing and logistics

• Dave invites feedback (1 = good; 2 = bad; 3 = indifferent) and thanks participants for sustained engagement.
• Offers: private “law bundle” membership and free family PMA access; thousands of hours of public content also available on YouTube, Rumble, Twitter, TikTok.
• Discoverability remains a challenge; members are asked to verify whether Spaces appear organically and share widely.
• Final counsel: decide early, act diligently, prepare in peace for the next fight—“fight like you practice.”