Unpacking MANTRA Chain’s Multi-VM Strategy and Institutional Expansion

Cryptic_Web3 avatar
Cryptic
@Cryptic_Web3Sep 23, 2025

The Spaces examined Mantra Chain’s multi-VM pivot, ecosystem-stablecoin design, and institutional expansion. Guest Nicholas (“Prof K”), Mantra Chain’s Chief Strategy Officer, traced the journey from a Cosmos SDK foundation to adding an EVM module to unlock developer network effects, lower audit costs, and align with standards institutions understand. He framed “ecosystem stables” (e.g., crvUSD, GHO) as $1-pegged instruments whose yield funds builders and users, avoiding native-token sell pressure and creating a positive flywheel. The discussion covered compliance-first primitives (bank module, ERC-3643/7639), bridging via LayerZero/Wormhole/Hyperlane versus IBC, and near-term UX tasks like a widget to move OM between Cosmos and EVM. Prof K highlighted Invenium’s $20M strategic investment, its Abu Dhabi base and backing (including Microsoft and G42), and a quantum-proofing approach using multi-chain hashing to secure AI inputs and RWA data. Looking forward, vaults will be the dominant RWA product, with AI increasingly curating assets and writing strategies. The call to action: explore OM on Mantra EVM (chain ID 5888); incentives and protocol deployments are imminent alongside Mantra USD’s rollout.

Cryptic Talks: Mantra Chain’s Multi-VM Strategy, Stablecoins, RWAs, and Institutional Expansion

Participants and Context

  • Guest: Nicholas (“Prof K”), Chief Strategy Officer at Mantra Chain. Recently relocated to Hong Kong; mentions shipping fast despite occasional city-wide shutdowns (typhoon/black rain).
  • Host: The show’s host (name not stated), leading “Cryptic Talks.”
  • Session focus: Mantra Chain’s pivot to a multi-VM stack, why EVM matters, building an institutional-grade RWA platform, stablecoin design (“ecosystem stable”), and the strategic implications of Invincium’s investment and AI-enabled vaults.

Key Themes

  • Stablecoins and RWAs as the backbone for institutional crypto adoption.
  • Multi-VM strategy: adding EVM alongside the Cosmos stack to unlock developer network effects and institutional integrations.
  • Ecosystem stablecoins to create uncorrelated on-chain yield and align incentives for builders/users without main-token selling pressure.
  • Compliance, standards, and tooling as prerequisites for institutional-grade tokenization.
  • Strategic capital and tech partnerships (Invincium) for quantum-proof data and AI-enabled vaults.

Multi-VM Strategy on Mantra Chain

  • Origin (Cosmos-first approach): Mantra initially launched as a “plain vanilla” Cosmos SDK chain, with compliance embedded at the protocol level via the Cosmos “bank module.” The bank module provided chain-level governance over tokens (rather than relying solely on smart-contract-level token implementations), intended to appeal to institutions.
  • Why add EVM:
    • Developer availability and cost: Nicholas reports a scarcity of CosmWasm developers and higher development costs; by contrast, EVM has the largest developer base (he estimates ~80% of crypto developers), accelerating build-out and reducing costs.
    • Standards and network effects: Ethereum’s mature standards (e.g., ERC-20, ERC-3643, vault standards) are widely adopted; Cosmos equivalents (CW standards) lack similar network effects and plug-and-play presets, raising friction for institutions who “only know what they know.”
    • Audits and reusability: EVM enables reuse of widely audited code; building Cosmos equivalents often requires fresh audits (Nicholas cites typical audit costs of ~$50k), inflating ecosystem development costs.
    • Integrations: With EVM, Mantra can credibly engage major protocols and infra providers (e.g., Aave, LayerZero, Wormhole, Hyperlane, Uniswap forks), speeding rollout and liquidity.
  • Current state and practicalities:
    • EVM module launched ~1–2 weeks prior to the session. Mantra is “hooking up the plumbing” over the next 5–6 weeks.
    • Bridging approach: While IBC is native to Cosmos, Nicholas notes current limitations connecting to EVM/Solana. Mantra intends to rely on multiple bridge options (Wormhole, LayerZero, Hyperlane) rather than waiting on IBC improvements.
    • Sovereign validator set remains a core strength via CometBFT consensus; combined with EVM as the primary VM and multiple bridges, Nicholas calls this a purpose-built RWA stack.
    • UX/tooling gaps acknowledged: example—a wrapped OM across Cosmos/EVM. Today, crypto-native users can manually move OM (import mnemonics, add RPC/chain ID), but Mantra plans a user-friendly widget to simplify transfers.
    • Chain details: Mantra EVM chain ID is 5888.

Stablecoins, RWAs, and the “Ecosystem Stable” Concept

  • RWAs as crypto’s central pillar: Nicholas argues RWAs have always been key—stablecoins are RWAs, and Tether’s product-market fit (along with BTC) underpins the industry.
  • Uncorrelated on-chain yield: Users love leverage and perps, but the ecosystem also needs stable, uncorrelated on-chain yield. First-wave RWA “yield coins” appreciated above $1 as yield accrued, confusing users—especially when marketed as “stable.”
  • Mantra’s stance on true stablecoins: The stablecoin should hold $1; yield accrues in the background and is distributed to benefit the ecosystem (builders, users, devs). Nicholas calls this an “ecosystem stable.” He cites USDH and “MetaMask USD” as early examples of ecosystem stables (his characterization).
  • Incentive alignment and avoiding the “doom loop”: Paying builders in the main token forces selling to fund work, creating persistent sell pressure. Ecosystem stablecoins allow yield-based rewards without main-token emissions, supporting a positive flywheel.
  • Industry parallels:
    • Curve’s pivot to crvUSD: Moving rewards to a native stable (instead of only in USDC/USDT) is part of building a healthier flywheel.
    • Aave’s GHO: Aave evolving from a “cool DeFi protocol” toward a top-tier on-chain bank was, in Nicholas’s view, powered by launching its own stablecoin.
  • Mantra stablecoin: “Mantra USD” is in the works, building on the recently released EVM module. Further details are to come.

Institutional Readiness and Compliance

  • Regulator familiarity: Institutions and regulators are not crypto-native; they recognize Bitcoin/Ethereum/Solana, not CosmWasm. Mapping ERC standards to CW standards (e.g., ERC-1155 vs. CW-1155) introduces complexity and friction.
  • Standards in focus: Nicholas emphasizes ERC-compliant standards for security tokens and compliant transfers, citing ERC-3643 and 7639 (noting Mantra is working with “Pricion” on the latter). Vault standards (e.g., the “Boring Vault” he associates with “7CS”) are recognizable in EVM, easing institutional onboarding.
  • Audits and documentation: EVM’s existing audits reduce time and cost. For institutions, comprehensive documentation, compliance testing, and clear guardrails are essential (custody flows, transaction types, controls).
  • UX: The host underscores the importance of polished interfaces and widgets at mainnet launch to prevent early friction and loss of trust.

Partnerships and Capital: Invincium’s Investment

  • Who is Invincium (as described by Nicholas): An Abu Dhabi–based RWA-focused firm with early, sustained interest in tokenizing securities (years before the current cycle). He notes investors like Microsoft and G42, and mentions a founding team member, Pat, is American—bridging Western and Emirates markets.
  • Historical links: Nicholas recounts that Invincium acquired assets from a company lineage he was connected to—factoring early academic roots (UT Austin’s “Factom” circa 2015–2016) and a successor effort “Wanchain” (Wide Area Network Chain) focused on decentralized bridges. He frames this as continuity of research-influenced, data-integrity-driven tokenization.
  • Strategic fit: Invincium’s position in ADGM and investor profile aligns with Mantra’s institutional ambitions. The investment provides credibility and potential distribution channels into forward-looking regulatory hubs.
  • Quantum-proofing thesis:
    • Patent and approach: Nicholas references an Invincium patent (“patent 002,” described as highly cited among cryptographic patents). Their thesis: hash data across multiple blockchains using different consensus mechanisms to achieve quantum-resistant integrity.
    • Rationale: Even if quantum capabilities threaten a single chain’s hash (e.g., SHA-256 on Bitcoin), multi-chain, multi-consensus hashing makes practical decryption infeasible across all chains simultaneously.
    • Relevance: In an AI-driven future, “trash in, trash out” must be mitigated. Quantum-proof data integrity ensures AI inputs remain trustworthy, preserving auditability for institutions.

AI in Tokenized Asset Infrastructure

  • Portfolio management at scale: Nicholas cites examples like Robinhood’s managed investing. He argues the future needs AI-driven portfolio management to eliminate emotion. Empirically, most human managers underperform indices; consistent outperformance is rare and episodic.
  • RWAs as vaults: Nicholas believes RWAs will predominantly be structured as vault products.
    • Vault stack components:
      • TAS partner (Tokenization as a Service), e.g., Brick.
      • The blockchain (Mantra) as the ledger and settlement layer.
      • Distribution portal(s), e.g., Mantra Zone or Mantra Finance; potentially decentralized distribution venues.
      • Asset curator.
      • Strategy writer.
    • AI roles: AI will likely fill the curator and strategy-writer roles, ingesting and standardizing off-chain data, forming strategies, and continuously managing vaults.
    • Scale expectations: Nicholas anticipates thousands of RWA vault products over the next two years.

Challenges, Risks, and Mitigations

  • Developer and liquidity migration: With EVM added, former CosmWasm teams on Mantra prefer to build EVM-side. Nicholas expresses empathy for Cosmos-native projects (e.g., Stargaze) facing migration pressures and cost competition.
  • Interoperability and bridges: IBC’s current limitations for EVM/Solana require pragmatic reliance on Wormhole, LayerZero, Hyperlane, etc. Security and user clarity are critical when assets move across VMs/environments.
  • Compliance and education: Institutions need clear, consistent standards (ERC-first), comprehensive documentation, and repeatable explanations. Mapping CW to ERC is a barrier; reducing cognitive overhead accelerates adoption.
  • UX and audit readiness: User-friendly widgets for token movement (e.g., OM across Cosmos/EVM) and leveraging audited EVM codebases can prevent early friction and reduce cost.

Notable Highlights

  • “Ecosystem stable” as Mantra’s core stablecoin design principle—$1 price, with yield accruing to the ecosystem (builders/users), not external issuers.
  • EVM module as a major unlock: access to developers, audited standards, integrations, and institutional paths.
  • Quantum-proofing via multi-chain hashing—positioned as a forward-looking necessity for AI-era data integrity.
  • Vision: Bring “billions” of RWAs on-chain; EVM is essential to achieve it.

Action Items and Next Steps

  • For developers:
    • Explore Mantra’s EVM environment (chain ID 5888). The team is “hooking up the plumbing” over the next 5–6 weeks.
    • Expect upcoming integrations (e.g., lending, perps, Uniswap forks) and tooling (widgets for OM movement across Cosmos/EVM).
    • Audits: consider using widely audited EVM contracts to reduce cost/time.
  • For institutions and RWA issuers:
    • Engage on ERC-compliant standards (e.g., ERC-3643, 7639) for compliant tokenization.
    • Consider vault-based structures with TAS partners (e.g., Brick), Mantra for settlement, and distribution via Mantra Zone/Mantra Finance.
    • Evaluate Invincium’s quantum-proofing approach for AI-ready data integrity.
  • For users/community:
    • “Get to know OM on EVM.” Incentives and protocols are not yet live, but are coming.
    • Follow official Mantra accounts and Prof K for updates on Mantra USD, ecosystem stables, and EVM-side launches.

Closing Notes

  • The session acknowledged real-world frictions (tooling, audits, compliance, education) while emphasizing speed, pragmatism, and alignment with the largest dev and standards ecosystem (EVM).
  • Mantra is positioning a sovereign-validator, EVM-first, multi-bridge stack tailored for RWAs, with ecosystem stablecoins to incentivize builders/users without main-token sell pressure.
  • Strategic partnerships (e.g., Invincium) and AI-led vault curation/strategy are seen as critical pillars for institutional-grade, quantum-resilient tokenization at scale.